|
May 3rd - Cockfosters 179 all out beat Bayford
& Hertford 146 all out by 33 runs - by Ben Wood
Bayford won the toss and
decided to bowl first. Unfortunately for them, Xav was in one of those
moods where anything (and everything) up to the bat was going to go. In
the first 15 overs, he preceded to play a different game to the rest of
us, helping to lose the new ball into Chalk Lane after only 5 overs.
There was something in it
for both sides and Cluney was well caught, playing a defensive shot to
short cover, and Scott came and went when he missed a straight one.
Woody joined up with Xav and was happy to just stand up the other end
and watch the destruction. Xav brought up his 50 with a 4, 6, 4 combo
but then perished, middling one straight to midwicket. Your
correspondent was at the non-striker's end when he went, and judging by
the bowler’s reaction, it’s fair to say they were quite happy to see him
go.
A pair of Pigdens came and
went and ‘Fosters were in a precarious position at 80-5 after 20. A
decent run rate but too many wickets down and the visitors were sensing
running through the card for 110. However, Chris Edwards did exactly
what he is renowned for and joined Woody in a 25 over stand worth 65
that had a significant bearing on the game.
Woody was a bit more
circumspect than usual and finally went for 64, trying one too many pick
ups into the boneyard. Ajit joined Chris and kept the scoreboard
ticking, as did 9, 10, jack and Fosters were all out for 179 in 52.4.
Special mention to Ajit who took quite possibly the riskiest single ever
to be seen at Chalk Lane, placing it about a yard wide of the stumps at
the non-strikers end and still making it home! Tea was taken with
‘Fosters knowing that 179 was a good effort and that Bayford would have
to go for them having inserted us. What happened next was a spell of
exceptional bowling which decided the game.
Xav opened up with Sam
Barker and the two of them put the openers under extreme pressure. So
much so that with 15 overs gone, only 17 were on the board! Not the
ideal start to chase down 4 an over. We knew we had to sit tight and
wait for something to give which it duly did, Sam picking up the first
three wickets for a measly 8 runs to a selection of relatively rash
shots. Sam & Xav bowled so well that they continued in tandem until 27
overs, the only blip when the Bayford number 4 decided to go ballistic,
scoring 30 odd in about 8 scoring shots! But both bowlers continued to
throw it up and wait for the inevitable mistake, which duly came when
the guy missed a straight one aiming for Underhill!
Bayford were always in the
hunt which is just how you like it as you know they’re going to continue
playing shots. And so it turned out, with Owen ‘golden arm’ Hughes
taking a wicket with the new ball before measly spells by Scott & Joe
Barker. The equation was reduced to 50 off 7 overs with three wickets in
hand – very gettable with a short boundary and a batsman well set. In
the end though, the match was always going to be decided by the slower
stuff and Cluney came on for a decisive spell. First he removed the
wicket keeper and next ball, the skipper took one to Scott who pinged it
in to Adam to run out the batsman who was in his 40’s.
Job done. Sam Barker with
4-64 from 16 deserved a special mention. Well bowled Sam – it would have
been five if Joe hadn’t deliberately dropped one to ensure his brother
didn’t get too much praise! All in all a very good performance to start
the season. Everyone contributed with bat, ball and in the field. Both
sides put down chances and all four batsmen who got runs were missed
early on. That’s only to be expected at this stage of the season but if
‘Fosters are to push on, fielding practice will be high on the agenda
next week.
Final word to Rick, who
ensured that the game went ahead. Thanks Rick and you were absolutely
right. With the outfield long and slow, your advice was ‘well they’ll
all just have to hit it in the air then won’t they’. A good call, as I
think that’s the first game I’ve ever played in where there were more
sixes than there were fours! |